<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>eLumen Community Forum - Standards of Achievement</title>
<description>Discuss your game plan for assessing abilities/achievements. What abilities are you assessing, and how have you organized your system?</description><link>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/list.php?8</link><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:54:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Phorum 5.2.6a</generator>
<item>
<guid>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/read.php?8,102,102#msg-102</guid>
<title>Working Backwards... (no replies)</title><link>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/read.php?8,102,102#msg-102</link><description><![CDATA[ <span style="font-size: medium"><span style="color: #336633"><strong class="bbcode">One key insight that seems to stand out in developing intended abilities and standards for their assessment, is that we need in some ways to do this backwards. That is, we need as institutions to work backwards from<br />*defining main institutional outcomes or abilities<br />*to defining program abilities/outcomes<br />*to defining discipline abilities/outcomes<br />*and finally to defining course abilities/outcomes<br /><br />The abilities/outcomes we then assess in a given assignment ought to be<br />1)clear and<br />2)usually linked to intended course--discipline--program--institutional abilities/outcomes<br /><br />This seems to make much sense, but I have met with some resistance at time in proposing this perspective...</strong></span></span>]]></description>
<dc:creator>anthrodocz</dc:creator>
<category>Standards of Achievement</category><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:40:57 -0700</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/read.php?8,77,77#msg-77</guid>
<title>Practical Application: Case Shakespeare (no replies)</title><link>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/read.php?8,77,77#msg-77</link><description><![CDATA[ Just completed an evaluation of student work on what I'm calling Analysis 1, which attempts to get students engaged in close reading of Shakespeare's Macbeth. Here's the assessment:<br /><br /><blockquote class="bbcode">Quote:<div>Analysis 1 for Shakespeare asks you to come at Macbeth with a practical and critical eye. In this written assessment, you should examine a particularly suggestive section (a soliloquy would work just fine, if it is substantive enough for analysis), a scene, an area that moves the plot, and discuss its significance to the play's overall conflict as you determine it. You should use terminology relevant to the study of a literary or dramatic work to give your analysis relevance and context. Think about it: we've talked about significant ideas and we've talked about particular elements of poetry and drama, such as imagery, metaphor, and alliteration, and these items work really well when you are identifying important quotes or aspects of the work for use in analysis. Sound patterns may provide clues to ideas Shakespeare may be emphasizing.<br />Consider how you should go about this, though. What sort of work is Macbeth? Even though this may be obvious, you should consider how the type of work shapes your decisions. Do elements of poetry and drama assist you in understanding the significance of your chosen passage to Macbeth as a whole?<br /><br />Note the Critical Thinking elements of this assignment requires you to support your conclusions with “adequate and persuasive” evidence. How will quoting from the play serve this purpose in the context of the assignment?<br /><br/></div></blockquote><br />Additionally, the assessment comes with a forecast of the abilities against which I'll be evaluating student work:<blockquote class="bbcode">Quote:<div>Assessed Course Ability<br />5. Literary Analysis: the ability to synthesize acts of analysis in the preceding abilities and communicating that analysis – primarily via the essay but can also be through oral presentations, performances, or other media.<br /><br />5.1 Level 1: Critically reflects on their reading of Shakespeare's works.<br />5.2 Level 1: Evaluates the significance of specific literary passages to the works of Shakespeare using appropriate terminology.<br /><br />Assessed General Education Abilities<br /><br />1. Communication<br />The ability to effectively articulate and communicate thoughts and ideas through writing and speech, and the ability to listen meaningfully and effectively.<br />1. Level 2: communicates with sophistication and complexity in the context of an academic discipline<br /><br />2. Critical Thinking<br />The process of evaluating information and concepts, identifying and analyzing relationships, and drawing and justifying reasonable inferences and conclusions in order to gain knowledge and insight, solve problems, and make decisions.<br /><br />2.3. Draws inferences and conclusions that are logical and supported by evidence<br /><br />2.3.3. Level 3: supports conclusions with adequate and persuasive evidence<br/></div></blockquote>
The assessment closes with the &quot;standards of evaluation,&quot; where I pitch to the student their progress thus far in the course relevant to &quot;general achievements&quot;:<br /><br /><img src="http://steveersinghaus.com/Courses/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/picture-1.jpg" class="bbcode" alt="http://steveersinghaus.com/Courses/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/picture-1.jpg" /><br /><br />I think it's important that the &quot;assignment&quot; portion of the assessment hint at the Literary and General Education Abilities so that student study practice matches the goals of the disciple and the abstracted gen ed abilities. Matephorcially, this is like Track and Field. In Track and Field most athletes Run, so running is the General Ability, as illustrated in the first gen ed in my rubric: <strong class="bbcode">communicates with sophistication and complexity in the context of an academic discipline</strong>. The Literary Studies Abilities describe the manifestation of &quot;academic discipline.&quot; The gen ed is written abstractly so that any discipline can define what &quot;sophistication and complexity in the context of an academic discipline&quot; means.<br /><br />The student submits all of this to me once their work is complete, at least by deadline, so that I can put the assessment into practice, returning the paper and the scoring sheet back to them so that they can improve their lapses. The critical issue here, at least in terms of eLumen, is that the rubrics are prepared and available in the system and once assessment is complete, the finished scores can be entered.<br /><br />More on this soon.]]></description>
<dc:creator>ersinghaus</dc:creator>
<category>Standards of Achievement</category><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:02:11 -0800</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/read.php?8,66,66#msg-66</guid>
<title>Assessment Issues: Case Study (1 reply)</title><link>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/read.php?8,66,66#msg-66</link><description><![CDATA[ Last week (well when doesn't really matter) I heard a report on NPR about Coke's purchase of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.honesttea.com/">Honest Tea</a>. In the car it suddenly hit me: I'll have my lit students write an essay on the relationships between Honest Tea and the Romantic poets we happened to be reading at the time.<br /><br />In class, I brought up the honest tea homepage and we went through the mission of the company and studied some of its products. Here we concentrated on the company's appeals to the audience and even the design of its bottles in relation to the mission. Then I gave students some time to draft out a written analysis that identified and defined certain Romantic notions and then related Honest Tea to Blake, Wordsworth, and Barbauld, even Robinson. If Honest Tea, for example, is interested in presenting its customers with an alternative beverage, what is the social and cultural context, and how do these issues square with Wordsworth's &quot;simple child&quot; in &quot;We are Seven.&quot; How does Blake's &quot;anti-institutionalism&quot; conform to Honest Tea's &quot;alternative&quot; consumption model?<br /><br />Barbauld clearly faces the sun of reason and logic against the moon's Contemplation, who lives in space unintruded upon (at least till the end of the poem, &quot;A Summer Evening . . .&quot;) by the light of logic. Honest Tea makes appeals in this regard, in this space.<br /><br />The assessment feature is pretty clear. Can the student identify the appropriate language and relations? Can the student define the terms? Can the student balance the examples such that a clear illustration of HT's position is drafted and then compared with a poet's specific articulation of the very same notion?]]></description>
<dc:creator>ersinghaus</dc:creator>
<category>Standards of Achievement</category><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:51:13 -0800</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/read.php?8,62,62#msg-62</guid>
<title>eLumen Fridays (no replies)</title><link>http://elumen.element-u.com/forum/read.php?8,62,62#msg-62</link><description><![CDATA[ I stole the concept or sound of eLumen Fridays from Eastgate Systems' Tinderbox Weekends.<br /><br />But, anyway, the plan for eLumen Fridays is to provide weekly opportunity for anyone to come in and talk to me about using eLumen for teaching and learning, which is really what the system is all about. I don't see eLumen as simply software for storing data or for crunching numbers but really as a piece of software that can help people organize their thinking around teaching and learning practice.<br /><br />For example, since Tunxis has begun a levels of mastery program for gen ed and some of our programs, the notion of an honor's program has really begun to crystallize. Let's say you have 4 levels of mastery within an Area of Learning called Problem Solving. So, you move from a foundation level to an advanced level inside Problem Solving. The 4 Level, or advanced, can be reserved for honors students and courses without having to create complex structures. In eLumen, you simply link the 4th mastery level in the form of an achievement or ability to a course and then link that ability to assignments built for that course, say Honors Algebra or Honors American Literature. Non-honors students are simply not responsible for the advanced requirement, but honors students will be. It's very simple.<br /><br />eLumen Fridays can help spread these kinds of ideas. But they're also good for anyone who just wants to set up an assignment in the system. I reserve 3 slots on Friday mornings, each thirty minutes in length.]]></description>
<dc:creator>ersinghaus</dc:creator>
<category>Standards of Achievement</category><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:55:26 -0800</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>